
Few pieces of legislation have the potential to fundamentally reshape an entire financial ecosystem; the CLARITY Act is one of them. By establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets, it aims to bring order and, as the name suggests, clarity to a space long defined by uncertainty – much as the Glass-Steagall Act sought to stabilize the American banking system during the Great Depression.
While the CLARITY Act remains pending, the legislative landscape continues to evolve, and the details discussed here may change. Nonetheless, should the Senate move forward with market structure legislation it would be a pivotal piece of financial reform. Therefore, it is worth looking at what the CLARITY Act may do for digital assets.
At its core, the CLARITY Act is a response to a fundamental question that regulators have struggled to answer: what are digital assets? The IRS defines them broadly as electronically held holdings that can be “bought, sold, owned, transferred, or traded.” In practice, they function as substitutes for traditional currency recorded on decentralized, cryptographically secured databases known as blockchains. These digital assets encompass a wide category ranging from cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, to non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
The absence of a clear regulatory framework has had real consequences. For years, digital assets have existed in a regulatory grey area subjected to “regulation by enforcement” as the SEC and CFTC have competed for jurisdiction. Under this patchwork approach, the SEC has treated most digital assets as securities under the 1946 Howey test , while the CFTC has classified many of the same digital assets as commodities. The CLARITY Act seeks to end this discrepancy by updating the nearly century-old law and clearly defining the roles of both agencies.
The current draft of CLARITY has three major components: 1) it lays out new definitions for the digital asset market, 2) it grants new roles to the SEC and CFTC, and 3) it introduces new regulations for market intermediaries. Each component addresses a unique grey area of current regulations:
The CLARITY Act still has a way to go before becoming law, but a recent bipartisan deal struck by Senators Alsobrooks (D-MD) and Tillis (R-NC) has meaningfully revived its prospects. The stakes are real: without a coherent regulatory framework, digital assets will continue to occupy a regulatory grey zone that stifles innovation and makes it difficult for investors and everyday users to understand their tax obligations.
The European Union (EU) fully implemented a comprehensive digital asset framework in 2024. The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulations created a single rulebook across all EU member states for crypto assets and service providers that focuses on disclosure and transparency, licensing of exchanges and custodians, and consumer protection and market integrity. While it may not be perfect, MiCA has provided structure for future growth and innovation in the EU.
The CLARITY Act has the potential to move the United States forward and beyond the “grey zone.” By establishing clear regulatory guidance, it represents an important step forward that could give investors and everyday users more confidence to participate in digital asset markets while also making it easier to understand and meet tax obligations. Whether it will get that chance remains to be seen.
Learn how IVIX is helping tax authorities bring crypto into compliance. Want to understand more about how crypto works? Schedule a "Crypto 101" training for your team. Talk to us today.